Provisions in Habitat Reform Bill Supported by Builders - 5/10/2004 - Home Exterior Environment Landscaping

Provisions in Habitat Reform Bill Supported by Builders

“We believe that several provisions within H.R. 2933 offer a real legislative solution to the current crisis regarding critical habitat,” said Don Walters, Jr., a home builder and developer from Flagstaff, AZ, and president of the Northern Arizona Home Builders Association. “However, we are concerned that the requirement in the bill linking critical habitat designations to the recovery planning process may unintentionally create a new litigation threat and place a higher regulatory burden on landowners.”

Testifying on behalf of NAHB, Walters said that this designation would blur important distinctions between the guidance of recovery plans and the regulation of critical habitat. For example, he noted that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had used recommendations from working drafts of the recovery plan for the cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl as justification for residential density requirements.

Several other provisions in the bill designed to protect the environment and allow local communities to expand and thrive were endorsed by NAHB, including the exclusion of habitat conservation plans and other species management and conservation plans from critical habitat designations.

“By codifying these important practices, the legislation would provide powerful incentives to private landowners to continue entering into such agreements to ensure species conservation and preservation,” said Walters.

The legislation would also require the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to take into account the direct, indirect and cumulative economic impacts when designating critical habitat and would establish statutory definitions for two key terms relating to critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act — “geographical area occupied by the species” and “essential to the conservation of the species.”

“Protecting our nation’s wildlife in a way that is cost-effective and clarifying the meaning of these terms will help to ensure that common-sense conservation policies and programs — and not litigation — will drive the critical habitat designation process. With the notable exception of linking critical habitat and recovery planning, NAHB believes that H.R. 2933 makes great strides in this direction,” said Walters.

To read the legislation, click here, and enter H.R. 2933 in the box at the upper left.

For more information, e-mail Jason Lynn at NAHB or call 800-368-5242 x8307.

Photo by Herman Farrer